[SECURITY] [DLA 3988-2] jinja2 regression update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3988-2 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Adrian Bunk
December 09, 2024 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : jinja2
Version : 2.11.3-1+deb11u2
This update fixes a regression that broke the python-jinja2 package
for Python 2.
Note that while this regression has been fixed, running applications
with Python 2 continues to be unsupported in Debian 11 bullseye:
https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#obsolescense-and-deprecation
For Debian 11 bullseye, this problem has been fixed in version
2.11.3-1+deb11u2.
We recommend that you upgrade your jinja2 packages.
For the detailed security status of jinja2 please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/jinja2
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=LkUQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: