[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 3985-1] gsl security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3985-1                debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/                          Adrian Bunk
December 07, 2024                             https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : gsl
Version        : 2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1
CVE ID         : CVE-2020-35357
Debian Bug     : 1052655

Buffer overflow when calculating the quantile value has been fixed in 
the GNU Scientific Library (GSL).

For Debian 11 bullseye, this problem has been fixed in version
2.6+dfsg-2+deb11u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your gsl packages.

For the detailed security status of gsl please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/gsl

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=pXtc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: