[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 3861-1] exfatprogs security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3861-1                debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/                          Adrian Bunk
September 02, 2024                            https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : exfatprogs
Version        : 1.1.0-1+deb11u1
CVE ID         : CVE-2023-45897

An out-of-bounds write has been fixed in the fsck.exfat tool that checks 
and repairs exFAT filesystems.

For Debian 11 bullseye, this problem has been fixed in version
1.1.0-1+deb11u1.

We recommend that you upgrade your exfatprogs packages.

For the detailed security status of exfatprogs please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/exfatprogs

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=wT4v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: