[SECURITY] [DLA 3064-1] firefox-esr security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3064-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
June 30, 2022 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : firefox-esr
Version : 91.11.0esr-1~deb9u1
CVE ID : CVE-2022-2200 CVE-2022-31744 CVE-2022-34468 CVE-2022-34470
CVE-2022-34472 CVE-2022-34479 CVE-2022-34481 CVE-2022-34484
Multiple security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web
browser, which could potentially result in the execution of arbitrary
code or spoofing.
For Debian 9 stretch, these problems have been fixed in version
91.11.0esr-1~deb9u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your firefox-esr packages.
For the detailed security status of firefox-esr please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/firefox-esr
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=bkEw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: