[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SECURITY] [DLA 2687-1] prosody security update



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2687-1                debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/                         Anton Gladky
June 15, 2021                                 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Package        : prosody
Version        : 0.9.12-2+deb9u3
CVE ID         : CVE-2021-32917 CVE-2021-32921

Two security issues have been discovered in prosody:

CVE-2021-32917

    The proxy65 component allows open access by default, even if neither of the
    users has an XMPP account on the local server, allowing unrestricted use of
    the server's bandwidth.

CVE-2021-32921

    Authentication module does not use a constant-time algorithm for comparing
    certain secret strings when running under Lua 5.2 or later. This can
    potentially be used in a timing attack to reveal the contents of secret
    strings to an attacker.

For Debian 9 stretch, these problems have been fixed in version
0.9.12-2+deb9u3.

We recommend that you upgrade your prosody packages.

For the detailed security status of prosody please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/prosody

Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Wp0Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: