[SECURITY] [DLA 2442-1] obfs4proxy security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2442-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Brian May
November 10, 2020 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : obfs4proxy
Version : 0.0.7-1+deb8u1
CVE ID : CVE-2019-11840
golang-go.crypto was recently updated with a fix for CVE-2019-11840. This in
turn requires all packages that use the affected code to be recompiled in order
to pick up the security fix.
CVE-2019-11840
An issue was discovered in supplementary Go cryptography libraries, aka
golang-googlecode-go-crypto. If more than 256 GiB of keystream is
generated, or if the counter otherwise grows greater than 32 bits, the amd64
implementation will first generate incorrect output, and then cycle back to
previously generated keystream. Repeated keystream bytes can lead to loss of
confidentiality in encryption applications, or to predictability in CSPRNG
applications.
For Debian 9 stretch, this problem has been fixed in version3
0.0.7-1+deb8u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your obfs4proxy packages.
For the detailed security status of obfs4proxy please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/obfs4proxy
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=9AtJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: