[SECURITY] [DLA 2398-1] puma security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2398-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Abhijith PA
October 07, 2020 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : puma
Version : 3.6.0-1+deb9u1
CVE ID : CVE-2020-11076 CVE-2020-11077
Several security vulnerabilities have been discovered in puma, highly
concurrent HTTP server for Ruby/Rack applications.
CVE-2020-11076
By using an invalid transfer-encoding header, an attacker could smuggle
an HTTP response.
CVE-2020-11077
client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to
send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses
persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP
pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the first request's body. Puma,
however, would see it as two requests, and when processing the second
request, send back a response that the proxy does not expect. If the
proxy has reused the persistent connection to Puma to send another
request for a different client, the second response from the first
client will be sent to the second client.
For Debian 9 stretch, this problem has been fixed in version
3.6.0-1+deb9u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your puma packages.
For the detailed security status of puma please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/puma
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE7xPqJqaY/zX9fJAuhj1N8u2cKO8FAl99oTUACgkQhj1N8u2c
KO9RBg//dlVOP41CgoUs7hdfJDc8m3t68cFVatVq+0nXIO/ip/s7AlsTO1T/5yOU
pKEUnLifkfuC1GGZ/l0F5FyaqKnwFzqVCgwCzl3y2S+AdmlbDrSqL+s+OgBvVZWs
prespWiJMlkpdw1VkVj0tLYikrwBcVDdHEp+21ZKz2muTdNOqaHbqapbL2aGm7tn
ZX3uVyN4J++f06hpfgsqrQnFxNxannm308gIicAvI4hb6nQy1qzJK9iR3v3r0rYH
l9NPddVtTIXBurOLWjPrjGb7yjPaWrxSWg7kK38BiO6t1lvCqg0UL1xbDL2xHGwO
fy/Qi+ccfrxjOc+nqXOIaZojXlntot8Nm7IHproKNN+JbtyOYreKRfh6ogIb0zhf
PDtoNWVMQIqVF05lIaWY5PfljoOq9mIhojSRwU/RdaZPZWjQ0WJMkGYxIkphiSq0
fRU90q6P2gjwJ0MbEW/xMASkQSDb9cG5qTHH2q12RHjg0QjlMrMwTy98hIlM+/KT
e755avOAzIHg/uBnNjK2+mu5MxJvB1g+tOEDhp6jPRraqPtFySV0MA6F2P0Ljz4s
DqulOQhnhYpK1m8Aqfyn4eBNWv3uwYXgIMVB4S60NMg4HwlfdP8Auvh+ILeEJAJP
qvAyW5s/+O2YRIpzzjGvQhtCX5c9Zk5MILsloJ4BroGNg6cfMsA=
=BPss
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: