Re: objections to revising the project description on theDebianLex wiki

To: et@ihear.com
Cc: debian-lex@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: objections to revising the project description on theDebianLex wiki
From: "Kevin T. Neely" <ktneely@astroturfgarden.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:29:24 -0700
Message-id: <4969e90e0903121729h39cbdddbs2477393f255a1aa9@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <1236903969.13790.1.camel@vici>
References: <1236814922.6604.18.camel@vici> <1236896308.6506.2.camel@vici> <4969e90e0903121608v656cd1e1ncb48d42a9d8e2715@mail.gmail.com> <1236903969.13790.1.camel@vici>

Oh yeah, cool. I think the Pure Blends thing makes sense as the other projects are using it.

cheers,
K

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:26 PM, ter <et@ihear.com> wrote:

On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 16:08 -0700, Kevin T. Neely wrote:
> I'm sure I have no objections, but what are the changes being called
> out? I must have missed the link somewhere.
>
> thanks,
> K

Please see top of the thread
http://lists.debian.org/debian-lex/2009/03/msg00020.html.

REgards,
Elaine

--
In Vino Veritas
http://rubbernecking.info

Reply to:

References:
- Re: objections to revising the project description on theDebianLex wiki
  - From: ter <et@ihear.com>
- Re: objections to revising the project description on theDebianLex wiki
  - From: ter <et@ihear.com>
- Re: objections to revising the project description on theDebianLex wiki
  - From: "Kevin T. Neely" <ktneely@astroturfgarden.com>
- Re: objections to revising the project description on theDebianLex wiki
  - From: ter <et@ihear.com>

Prev by Date: Re: objections to revising the project description on theDebianLex wiki
Next by Date: re-categorizing
Previous by thread: Re: objections to revising the project description on theDebianLex wiki
Next by thread: re-categorizing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread