Re: debian-lex
- To: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
- Cc: debian-lex@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: debian-lex
- From: ter <et@ihear.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:47:33 -0700
- Message-id: <1236710853.6563.36.camel@vici>
- Reply-to: et@ihear.com
- In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903100707220.1963@wr-linux02>
- References: <1236194756.6628.63.camel@vici> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903050918410.28685@wr-linux02> <49B038F9.9000803@bariloche.com.ar> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903060814470.3176@wr-linux02> <49B27481.8000401@bariloche.com.ar> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903072310170.8976@wr-linux02> <1236577209.6745.41.camel@vici> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903090726300.30246@wr-linux02> <1236635746.6595.75.camel@vici> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903100707220.1963@wr-linux02>
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 07:18 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, ter wrote:
>
> > Just did a non-user checkout. So my svn shibboleth is OK (I use bzr
> > myself, which can work with just http+ssh. But doesn't look like alioth
> > supports that).
>
> Supports what? Alioth has bzr in principle and some projects are using it.
> But we had enough discussion about competing Vcs systems. IMHO, the blends
> stuff is currently simple enough to be handled with any Vcs so there is no
> reason to change.
Just expressing my personal unfamiliarity, and certainly not incitement
to start a vcs war. But it looks like all the vcs's really provide the
same basic commands, so I am getting the hang of svn.
> I have no idea whether http/https WebDAV extension is
> installed on Alioth - is there any advantage over pristine anonymous svn?
May not be any advantage - just provides another view, without any
vcs-specific encumbrance - may not be worth the hassle, and I am not
asking for it.
>
> > I can't do a svn+ssh checkout yet - I assume it's
> > because my key hasn't been cron'ed, and not because I made a mistake.
> > I'll try again later.
>
> You should be able to use your password in case the key is not yet propagated.
> If it does not work after 48 hours just contact alioth admins.
I made a mistake after all - used the wrong key.
>
> > Also if those who have been active on the wiki already know which or all
> > of the listed non-Debian packages are active, and relevant, or have used
> > them, please help out.
>
> Checking for activity is vey important. I learned that there are many
> "one man show" projects popping up in these special fields and if these
> people fail in forming a community around the project in most cases it
> will die (when real life draws the interest of the programmers in different
> directions).
In defense of "one man" or "one woman" shows - they could yield that
catalyst we are looking for. If that one man has persisted for the last
5 years, maybe there is value in his scratching, even if he were to lose
the itch. It's a FOSS strength to reuse his work even after he leaves.
As you said, this happens frequently in "special fields". I think
debian-lex is a hard problem because it is trying to coalesce a bunch of
"special fields", which in this case are layers of bureaucratic
practices on top of myriad legal systems on top of many languages.
Regards,
Elaine
Reply to: