Re: debian-lex

[ter <et@ihear.com>]

On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 07:30 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, ter wrote:
> 
> > Dr. Stehmann's has entered this info into the wiki
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianLex/software#administration . I would like
> > to take a look at it with Steve, who knows DE. Maybe Dr. Stehmann has
> > solved my frames problem.
> 
> Just commited
> 
> $ svn diff
> Index: admin
> ===================================================================
> --- admin       (Revision 1420)
> +++ admin       (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -26,3 +26,14 @@
> 
>   Depends: virtualaw
>   X-Comment: Insert info according to http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-lex/software.en.html here
> +
> +Depends: canzeley
> +Homepage: http://canzeley.de/
> +License: GPLv3
> +Pkg-Description: attorney's office programm based on OpenOffice.org
> + An attorney's office programm based on OpenOffice.org and MySQL. It is written in StarBasic.
> + .
> + The UI (and the comments in the program) are in German language.
> + .
> + It is still usable, but some very nice to have functions are still in
> + progress.
> 
> Anybody who would volunteer to complete the work of turning the information
> in the Wiki into tasks files?
> 
Just did a non-user checkout. So my svn shibboleth is OK (I use bzr
myself, which can work with just http+ssh. But doesn't look like alioth
supports that). I can't do a svn+ssh checkout yet - I assume it's
because my key hasn't been cron'ed, and not because I made a mistake.
I'll try again later.

I would like to at least first check on the current status of each
software package, I just checked the project site for "etude", which was
much discussed back when. "etude" has sparse but continuing recent
activities. I haven't used "etude" myself. If anyone here has, please
tell us your experience.

Also if those who have been active on the wiki already know which or all
of the listed non-Debian packages are active, and relevant, or have used
them, please help out.

I am going to start a different thread to request a discussion on the
topic of revising the project description.

Elaine