debian-legal Nov 2009 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec
Jose Antonio Quevedo
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec
Paul Wise
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec
Jose Antonio Quevedo
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec
Paul Wise
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec
Jose Antonio Quevedo
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec
Paul Wise
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec
Jose Antonio Quevedo
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Looking for +info about the license of a new package: Ossec
Joe Smith
Distro baseada en DEBIAN====Distribuicion basada en DEBIAN === Distro Based DEBIAN
Gilson
bsd & modified bsd clarification
Penny Leach
Re: bsd & modified bsd clarification
Don Armstrong
Re: bsd & modified bsd clarification
Charles Plessy
Re: bsd & modified bsd clarification
Penny Leach
Re: bsd & modified bsd clarification
Charles Plessy
Copyright information in new tuxcmd version compat/{crc.pas,md5.pas}
Salvatore Bonaccorso
Re: Copyright information in new tuxcmd version compat/{crc.pas,md5.pas}
Salvatore Bonaccorso
Re: Re: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG?
Eugen Dedu
Re: Re: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG?
Paul Wise
Re: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG?
Eugen Dedu
Re: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG?
Paul Wise
opencore amr license, was: Bug#532456: Are these licenses DFSG?
Reinhard Tartler
Re: RFS: spim
Mackenzie Morgan
Re: RFS: spim
Ben Finney
Re: RFS: spim
Ben Finney
RE: RFS: spim
Jim Larus
Re: RFS: spim
Paul Wise
RE: RFS: spim
Jim Larus
Re: RFS: spim
Ben Finney
RE: RFS: spim
Jim Larus
Re: RFS: spim
Ben Finney
Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Luca Falavigna
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Michael Below
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Francesco Poli
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Eion Robb
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Gabriele Giacone
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Ben Finney
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Gunnar Wolf
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Eion Robb
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Ben Finney
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Arnoud Engelfriet
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Mike Hommey
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Paul Wise
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Mike Hommey
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Paul Wise
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Gabriele Giacone
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Ben Finney
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Mike Hommey
Search provider icons in web browsers (was: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages)
Ben Finney
Re: Search provider icons in web browsers (was: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages)
Mike Hommey
Re: Search provider icons in web browsers
Ben Finney
Re: Search provider icons in web browsers
Mike Hommey
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Gunnar Wolf
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Joe Smith
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Anthony W. Youngman
Re: Skype/Facebook trademark logos in Debian packages
Francesco Poli
Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG (take 2)
Bill Allombert
Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG (take 2)
Francesco Poli
Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view?
Laszlo Lebrun
Re: Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view?
MJ Ray
Re: Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view?
Andrew M.A. Cater
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view?
Laszlo Lebrun
Re: Are debian/ubuntu distributions "commercial applications" from a legal point of view?
Florian Weimer
GPL versions mismatch.
Raúl Sánchez Siles
Re: GPL versions mismatch.
Anthony W. Youngman
Re: GPL versions mismatch.
Raúl Sánchez Siles
Re: GPL versions mismatch.
Anthony W. Youngman
Re: GPL versions mismatch.
Ben Finney
Re: GPL versions mismatch.
Raúl Sánchez Siles
Re: GPL versions mismatch.
Raúl Sánchez Siles
Re: GPL versions mismatch.
Anthony W. Youngman
Re: GPL versions mismatch.
Raúl Sánchez Siles
Re: GPL versions mismatch.
Anthony W. Youngman
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers
Steve Langasek
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers
Florian Weimer
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers
Matthias Klose
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers
Florian Weimer
Re: GCC 4.4 run-time license and non-GPLv3 compilers
Steve Langasek
Re: [mt@debian.org: Re: RFS: php-clamav]
Michael Tautschnig
Re: [mt@debian.org: Re: RFS: php-clamav]
Francesco Poli
Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible?
Salvatore Bonaccorso
Re: Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible?
Salvatore Bonaccorso
Re: Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible?
Tomáš Bžatek
Re: Mixture of Code unter GPL-2+ and UnRAR license compatible?
Francesco Poli
How The Little Guy Can Make Big Money in Commercial Real Estate - Now!
CRE Triage Capital
The last update was on 16:48 GMT Wed May 01. There are 84 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc