On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:33:59 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: > Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > It seems to me that bug #521448 is an attempt to report this [...] > > I am not sure whether the bug should be reopened or maybe another bug > > report should be filed against gammu. > > What do others think? > > Reopen and retitle? As I understand policy 2.2.2, the gammu applet is > almost exactly the example of "free packages which require [...] > packages which are not in our archive at all for compilation or > execution" at the moment. Minor but essential. Could you please do that? I think you investigated the issue far more than I have personally done, hence I think you could better explain the problem, and point to the relevant files, and so forth... -- New location for my website! Update your bookmarks! http://www.inventati.org/frx ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpeQwybI_UhV.pgp
Description: PGP signature