On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:21:40 +0000 MJ Ray wrote: [...] > Section 7 of http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/1.1.txt > allows us to pick a later version, so we can use it under the free > software APSL 2.0. I don't think the APSL 2.0 is acceptable for main. Last time we discussed this license on debian-legal, the consensus seemed to be that software distributed (solely) under the terms of the APSL version 2.0 does *not* comply with the DFSG. I've just re-read the thread: it seems that nobody said the license was OK. Please see the following thread http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00545.html for all the details. As usual: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP. -- On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND "nano-documents" may lead you to my website... ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpxoVnYzVm6u.pgp
Description: PGP signature