Re: Shouldn't flashplugin-nonfree be in non-free

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't flashplugin-nonfree be in non-free
From: Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:58:26 +0100
Message-id: <1206021506.8872.18.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to: <4694c99f0803190141p633689d5t3dce854decf1bd96@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4694c99f0803190141p633689d5t3dce854decf1bd96@mail.gmail.com>

Am Mittwoch, den 19.03.2008, 09:41 +0100 schrieb timothy demulder:

> Could someone explain me why flashplugin-nonfree is residing in
> contrib and not in non-free?

http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-sections

HTH and Regards, Daniel

Reply to:

References:
- Shouldn't flashplugin-nonfree be in non-free
  - From: "timothy demulder" <timothy.demulder@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ITP:Bug#460591 - Falcon P.L. license
Next by Date: Re: Falcon P.L. license (ITP:Bug#460591)
Previous by thread: Re: Shouldn't flashplugin-nonfree be in non-free
Next by thread: ITP:Bug#460591 - Falcon P.L. license
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread