"Jason Spiro" <jasonspiro4@gmail.com> wrote in message ff7ab970705221231l2daf9cdx920ec543ed1359d7@mail.gmail.com">news:ff7ab970705221231l2daf9cdx920ec543ed1359d7@mail.gmail.com...
On 5/15/07, Matthew Johnson <debian@matthew.ath.cx> wrote: ...How about: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/legalcode with 4. d. added saying: You may not publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform the Work except as part of the game and you may not distribute the Work except with the intention of it being used with the Game. and 1. g.: "The Game" means the game Frets on Fire or a derivative work of Frets on Fire.Dear debian-legal, The license is below. Is it good enough for Tommi Inkila's FoF music to be uploaded to non-free?
I do not personally see any distribution problems with this licence. The only possible (general) issue is the exact definition of the game "Frets on fire". Does that alow minor derivitives that use the same name? (That is what Debian would be distributing, most likely, as Debian packages often include patches against the source code). It would be nice if this would be expanded to include all derivitves of FoF. However, even just expansion to include all derivitives of FoF that retain the same game style (that is to say are still Guitar Hero clones), would be an improvment.