Le jeudi 24 mai 2007 à 10:54 -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit : > This License shall be governed by the law of the jurisdiction > specified in a notice contained within the Original Software > (except to the extent applicable law, if any, provides otherwise), > excluding such jurisdiction's conflict-of-law provisions. Any > litigation relating to this License shall be subject to the > jurisdiction of the courts located in the jurisdiction and venue > specified in a notice contained within the Original Software, with > the losing party responsible for costs, including, without > limitation, court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees and > expenses. Please stop the choice-of-law bullshit. This clause is moot, we can ignore it. > [...] > You agree that You alone are responsible for compliance with the > United States export administration regulations (and the export > control laws and regulation of any other countries) when You use, > distribute or otherwise make available any Covered Software. > > It's not appropriate for a Free Software license to require users of > software to give up rights that they would normaly have in their own > jurisdiction. Being responsible for compliance does not mean compliance is necessary for using the software. Even if it would, US law only applies to US citizens; there's no way a Russian can violate these regulations. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=