On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:06:48 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote: [...] > If you as an author do not want to distribute the source (or more > importantly, require others who modify your source to do so) then you > should pick a license like MIT or expat. Wait, wait! If someone releases a work under the Expat license *without* providing its source, the work is *not* Free Software, as it lacks source! Hence, I would say: If you as an author do not want to require others (who modify and/or redistribute your work) to distribute source, then you should pick a non-copyleft license, such as the Expat/MIT license. You should distribute the source for your work anyway, *if* you want the work to be Free Software. -- http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html Need to refresh your keyring in a piecewise fashion? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpM2qD6aL1Vy.pgp
Description: PGP signature