Re: Free art license, CC and DFSG
Evan Prodromou <email@example.com>
> My opinion is based on the contribution of debian-legal participants, of
> the workgroup participants, and of my own review of the licenses.
I don't doubt that. However, that's still your opinion rather than the
Workgroup's. I don't mean anything bad by that. Just a correction to
what was written.
> [...] I also believe that a large number of debian-legal
> participants have said that the DRM clause, as it stands, is free enough
> to allow distribution under DRM if such DRM is not "effective" [...]
I'm now sufficiently confused by CC/DRM/DReaM and others that I would
advise everyone to run away, run away from that lawyerbomb. I seem
to remember that RMS also advised people to avoid promoting CC until
they sort out what the devil they stand for. Until we see a few of
the anti-TPM zealots try to use CC to punish parallel distribution,
we probably won't know what the current licence means in practical terms.
Hope that explains,
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct