[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL



On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 05:02:54PM -0500, Michael Poole wrote:
> Plenty.  17 USC 107 defines fair use.  Many non-US jurisdictions do
> not have any fair use provisions under copyright law.

Give an example of one.

> > What part of copyright law states that you can only have one backup copy?
> 
> 17 USC 117 is what allows you to make a backup copy under US law.
> Again, if you try that outside of the US, your mileage may vary.

17 USC 117 does not say that only one backup copy may be made.

> > > Computer security need not be entirely done away with, just done away
> > > with in the context of works under this license.
> > 
> > Since we are only discussing works distributed under this license, it is 
> > essentially the same thing.
> 
> If they are the same thing, then the GFDL clearly contaminates other
> works stored on the same computer, failing DFSG#9.

Only if you accept this ludicrous line of reasoning.

--Adam
-- 
Adam McKenna  <adam@debian.org>  <adam@flounder.net>



Reply to: