Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR
Scripsit MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>
> I assert that their arguments are not part of the position statement
> (= not part of what was approved by vote) and that trying to interpret
> hidden meanings of the position statement is daft.
As far as I can see our choices are: (1) Ignoring the GR, which would
mean that our advice would not say anything about how the Debian
Project feels about licences. (2) Accepting the GR as a statement
about the literal meaning of the GFDL, which is simply untrue. (3)
Trying to find some way of understanding the GR that is neither false
nor self-contradictory.
If you have a fourth option that I have overlooked, I would love to
hear about it.
--
Henning Makholm "Wir kommen nun ans Ziel unserer Ausführungen."
Reply to: