Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL
Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net>
> Joe Buck wrote:
>
> >That is, the necessity to make a written offer good for three years
> >is sometimes painful, as is the necessity to keep a transparent copy
> >available for one year. I did not understand why debian-legal found
> >the latter provision a DFSG violation.
> >
> We found both of them to be DFSG violations. [...]
Please provide references. From my recollection and Manoj Srivastava's
draft PS, it was far from the consensus in the general case for the latter.
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: