Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL
Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net> wrote:
> I believe there are essentially two reconciliations we can have for each
> problem listed in the position statement [2]: Either "that does not make
> things non-free" or "that is not the intended reading of the license,
> stop nit-picking so much."
Or that the GR changed the DFSG, and the proponents managed to
browbeat the secretary into not requiring a 3:1 majority.
Cheers,
Walter Landry
wlandry@ucsd.edu
Reply to: