On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:57:55AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > I've opened bugs now, I don't know if it hasn't happened before. > > > Please Cc' the respective bugs so that we know it's fixed either way. > > > The possible options that I see are: > > > 1. audacity/portaudio are removed from Debian > > > 2. license text is modified so that it clarifies that the 'request' is > > > a non-binding request which is optional and not a mandatory section. > > I'm confused. d-legal came to the conclusion, as far as I can tell, that > > this isn't a problem; that it would be nice to move it out of the license > > (wishlist), or to note redundantly on their webpage that this is a request > > (also wishlist), but this is unambiguously a non-binding request already; > > it uses the very word "request". Why are you opening bugs? > License text does not explain that it is a 'wishlist'; the term > 'request' can be binding or non-binding depending on interpretation, > and is not a good word to use without defining the scope. That is > where the non-clarity lies. I think the word "request" is pretty unambiguous. Anyway, ambiguities regarding the meaning of a license aren't RC bugs. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature