debian-legal Mar 2006 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 2

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Jérôme Marant

RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 17

Claus Färber

Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 07
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13

Frank Küster

Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Is the GUST-FONT-NOSOURCE-LICENSE free? Mar 14
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 03
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 05
License advice: LPPL with additional restrictions Mar 29
Re: how to properly specify "Public Domain"? Mar 30
Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Re: how to properly specify "Public Domain"? Mar 30
Re: how to properly specify "Public Domain"? Mar 31
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 12
Re: Is the GUST-FONT-NOSOURCE-LICENSE free? Mar 20
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 04
Format of the copyright file Mar 31
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 03
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 03
How to free GFDL'ed documents with existing Front Cover texts Mar 14
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 03
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Re: License advice: LPPL with additional restrictions Mar 30
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 05
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 06
Re: Debian packaging and (possible) Eterm license violations Mar 28
how to properly specify "Public Domain"? Mar 30
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 05
Re: Is the GUST-FONT-NOSOURCE-LICENSE free? Mar 16
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 12
Re: Package copyright problems Mar 15

Måns Rullgård

Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 21
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 18
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 24
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 20
Re: MIT licenses Mar 21
Re: GPL v3 possible issues. Mar 18
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: x264 for Debian Mar 02
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: x264 for Debian Mar 03
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: x264 for Debian Mar 03

Peter Černák

ttf-dejavu and Bitstream's license (bug#353462) Mar 24

Jérôme Marant

Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 25
Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 22
Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 18
Re: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 18
Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 17
Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 22

Adam Borowski

Re: Is the GUST-FONT-NOSOURCE-LICENSE free? Mar 17
Re: Is the GUST-FONT-NOSOURCE-LICENSE free? Mar 15

Adam McKenna

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 18
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 18
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20

Alexander Terekhov

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Daniel Wallace case vs. FSF thrown out, ordered to pay costs Mar 22
Re: Question about upstream duty as regards with OpenSSL Mar 17
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: Question about upstream duty as regards with OpenSSL Mar 17
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 18

Alp Toker

All rights reserved? Mar 16

Andrew Donnellan

Re: Interpretation of the GFDL in light of the recent GR Mar 17
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: GPL v3 possible issues. Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19

Andrew Saunders

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 16

Anthony DeRobertis

Interpretation of the GFDL in light of the recent GR Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 16
Re: MPL license Apr 01
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 18
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: Interpretation of the GFDL in light of the recent GR Mar 18
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 19
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 18
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 18
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 16
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: The compliance of the licences of OpenCascade and WildMagic libraries to the GPL requirements of Debian Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 18
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12

Anthony Towns

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17

Arc Riley

Re: x264 for Debian Mar 03
Panda3d Public License? Mar 25
Re: x264 for Debian Mar 02
Re: x264 for Debian Mar 02

Bas Zoetekouw

Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02

Batist Paklons

Re: how to properly specify "Public Domain"? Mar 30
Re: Belgian Courts, was: Results for ... Mar 13

Benjamin A'Lee

Re: Package copyright problems Mar 15

Benjamin Seidenberg

Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19

Bernhard R. Link

Re: no longer a bug. Mar 13
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19

Branden Robinson

Daniel Wallace case vs. FSF thrown out, ordered to pay costs Mar 21

Damyan Ivanov

Re: MPL license Mar 27
RFC: the new license for IBPP Mar 30
IBPP license 1.0 Mar 18
Please comment on IBPP licensing Mar 07
Re: Please comment on IBPP licensing Mar 08
Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP Mar 30
Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP Mar 31
Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again Mar 23

David Liontooth

Re: x264 for Debian Mar 02

Dominik Margraf

compartibility of license of Wild Magic library with the Debian main and non-free repositories Mar 21

Don Armstrong

Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 18
Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again Mar 24
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: Question about upstream duty as regards with OpenSSL Mar 18
Re: how to properly specify "Public Domain"? Mar 30
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Mar 02
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 26
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: GPL v3 possible issues. Mar 18
Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 22
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: [Debconf-video] Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 09
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 27
Re: GPL v3 possible issues. Mar 19

Ed Hill

Debian packaging and (possible) Eterm license violations Mar 28
Re: Debian packaging and (possible) Eterm license violations Mar 28
Re: Debian packaging and (possible) Eterm license violations Mar 28

Eduard Bloch

Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 21
cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 18
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 18

Florent Bayle

Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 22
Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 24

Florian Weimer

Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 13
Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: MPL license Mar 28
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Academic Free License 1.1 Mar 10

Francesco P. Lovergine

Re: All rights reserved? Mar 16
Re: [DebianGIS] GPL versus BSD Mar 16
GPL versus BSD Mar 16

Francesco Poli

Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP Mar 30
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 11
Re: MPL license Mar 26
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 18
Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 29
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 24
Re: x264 for Debian Mar 03
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 24
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 27
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 24
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 07
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 26
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 22
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 10
Re: Please comment on IBPP licensing Mar 07
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 05
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 05
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 14
Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 24
Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 25
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 25
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 20
MIT licenses [was: Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0] Mar 21
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 20
Re: x264 for Debian Mar 03
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP Mar 31
FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 22
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system Mar 19
Re: MPL license Mar 28
Re: [Debconf-video] Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 10
Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 24
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 03
Re: MIT licenses Mar 22
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 22
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 08

Free Ekanayaka

Re: Packaging fst and dssi-vst Mar 02
Packaging fst and dssi-vst Mar 02
Is fst distributable in binary form? Mar 10
Re: Packaging fst and dssi-vst Mar 02
Re: Packaging fst and dssi-vst Mar 02

Glenn Maynard

Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 11
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 15
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 15
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: All rights reserved? Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 15
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 15
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 15
Testing, one, two ... Mar 10
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16
Re: All rights reserved? Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16

Goswin von Brederlow

Re: Antique RC bugs (many about licensing) Mar 15

Henning Makholm

Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 15
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 16
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16
Re: Package copyright problems Mar 15
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 15
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Bug#323099: no longer a bug. Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Package copyright problems Mar 15
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 15
Re: All rights reserved? Mar 16

Henri Sivonen

Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 05

Holger Levsen

Re: [Debconf-video] Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 09
better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 08

Jaakko Kangasharju

Re: GFDL'ed documents with Front Cover text Mar 26

Jacobo Tarrio

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again Mar 23
Re: no longer a bug. Mar 13
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Mar 06
Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP Mar 30
Re: MPL license Mar 26
Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again Mar 24
Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again Mar 24

JC Helary

Re: how to properly specify "Public Domain"? Mar 30
(OT) Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12

Jeremy Hankins

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 17
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 30
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 15
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 16

Jesse van den Kieboom

Re: Package copyright problems Mar 17
Package copyright problems Mar 15

Joachim Nilsson

Re: [PATCH 03/04] Load keyspan firmware with hotplug Mar 13

Joe Buck

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12

Joe Smith

Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 09
Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0 Mar 20
Re: Academic Free License 1.1 Mar 09
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: The compliance of the licences of OpenCascade and WildMagic libraries to the GPL requirements of Debian Mar 17
Re: Is the GUST-FONT-NOSOURCE-LICENSE free? Mar 14
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Mar 05
Re: compartibility of license of Wild Magic library with the Debian main and non-free repositories Mar 22
Re: The compliance of the licences of OpenCascade and WildMagic libraries to the GPL requirements of Debian Mar 17
Re: The compliance of the licences of OpenCascade and WildMagic libraries to the GPL requirements of Debian Mar 17
Re: Panda3d Public License? Mar 25
Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0 Mar 20
Re: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 18
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 04

Joerg Jaspert

Re: Question about upstream duty as regards with OpenSSL Mar 18
Re: Question about upstream duty as regards with OpenSSL Mar 18
MPL license Mar 26

Joey Hess

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Academic Free License 1.1 Mar 08
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Academic Free License 1.1 Mar 10

John Watson

GPL v3 possible issues. Mar 18

Josh Triplett

Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Mozilla relicensing complete Apr 01
Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 25
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 18
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 21
Re: Packaging fst and dssi-vst Mar 02
The LGPL's GPL upgrade clause and "or later" Mar 27
Re: Interpretation of the GR Mar 21
Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 22
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Antique RC bugs (many about licensing) Mar 13
Re: RFC: the new license for IBPP Apr 01
Re: All rights reserved? Mar 21
Re: GFDL'ed documents with Front Cover text Mar 25

Julian Gilbey

Re: Format of the copyright file Mar 31

Junichi Uekawa

Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Mar 01
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Mar 04
Bug#354898: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Mar 01
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Mar 01
Bug#354899: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Mar 01

Justin Pryzby

Re: BOLA licence (darcsweb): free or not? Mar 22
Re: Debian packaging and (possible) Eterm license violations Mar 28
Re: Please comment on IBPP licensing Mar 07
Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 22

Kalle Kivimaa

Re: A new practical problem with invariant sections? Mar 01
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17

Ken Arromdee

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 18
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 30

Marco d'Itri

Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: MPL license Mar 27
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 05
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Mar 19
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: MPL license Mar 29
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Re: Please comment on IBPP licensing Mar 09

Mark Hymers

Re: Packaging fst and dssi-vst Mar 02
Re: Packaging fst and dssi-vst Mar 02

Mark Rafn

Re: Software license used for SHA-2 reference code Mar 08
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 02
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 19

Matthias Klose

Re: Antique RC bugs (many about licensing) Mar 18

Michael Poole

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 15
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Debian packaging and (possible) Eterm license violations Mar 28
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Debian packaging and (possible) Eterm license violations Mar 28
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Question about upstream duty as regards with OpenSSL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 19
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20

Mike Hommey

Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Mar 19
Re: MPL license Mar 26
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Mar 19
Re: MPL license Mar 26
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Mar 20
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Mar 19
Re: (OT) Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: x264 for Debian Mar 03
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Mar 20

Mike O'Connor

no longer a bug. Mar 12
Re: Bug#323099: no longer a bug. Mar 13

Milan Babuskov

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again Mar 23

milanb

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again Mar 24

MJ Ray

Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 26
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 22
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 27
Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 22
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 23
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Mar 03
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 16
Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0 Mar 23
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 26
Re: GPL v3 possible issues. Mar 19
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 03
Re: [Portaudio] Re: portaudio in Debian, license updates? Mar 01
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 13
Re: Question about upstream duty as regards with OpenSSL Mar 18
Re: Please comment on IBPP licensing Mar 08
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Bug#323099: no longer a bug. Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: GFDL'ed documents with Front Cover text Mar 26
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 20
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 12
Re: GFDL'ed documents with Front Cover text Mar 27
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 15
Re: Bug#323099: no longer a bug. Mar 12
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 10
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 13
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 27
Academic Free License 1.1 Mar 10
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 28
Re: Problematic distribution of P2P clients in France Mar 19
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 20
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 03
Re: ttf-dejavu and Bitstream's license (bug#353462) Mar 26
Re: GPL v3 possible issues. Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 18
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 15
Re: Package copyright problems Mar 15
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 26
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 30
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: License advice: LPPL with additional restrictions Mar 29
Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects Mar 26
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 17
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 19
Re: [IBPP-DISCUSS] IBPP license 1.0 Mar 20
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 19
Re: GPL v3 possible issues. Mar 19
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 21
Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 12
Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 21
Re: better licence for fosdem, debconf, .., videos... Mar 22
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16
Belgian Courts, was: Results for ... Mar 13
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16

Moritz Muehlenhoff

Re: Results for Debian's Position on the GFDL Mar 14

Nathanael Nerode

Re: How to free GFDL'ed documents with existing Front Cover texts Mar 16
Re: RFH: Non-free files in Emacs Mar 21
Re: Interpreting the GFDL GR Mar 16
Re: All rights reserved? Mar 16
Antique RC bugs (many about licensing) Mar 13
Re: Re: how to properly specify "Public Domain"? Mar 31
Re: GFDL'ed documents with Front Cover text Mar 29
Re: Antique RC bugs (many about licensing) Mar 31
Re: Package copyright problems Mar 16
Re: Package copyright problems Mar 16
Interpretation of the GR Mar 16
Re: BOLA licence (darcsweb): free or not? Mar 23
Re: Free documents using non-free fonts - can they be in main? Mar 06

The last update was on 09:47 GMT Sun May 19. There are 615 messages. Page 1 of 2.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 2

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc