Re: GPL v3 Draft
On 1/18/06, Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:34:24AM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > On 1/18/06, Alexander Terekhov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > On 1/18/06, Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:48:11AM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > > > > Care to post a link to rules of New York?
> > > >
> > > > It's not up to me. You charged Moglen with offenses, you back it up.
> > >
> > > In this type of offence it sorta goes the other way around: let Moglen back
> > > up some of his fraudulent legal claims like "the GPL is not a contract" ("no
> > > need" to upper case disclaimers aside for a moment).
> > Here's an example.
> > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.int-property/msg/af75f708f55b4f5a
> > (PTRAVEL is a practicing IP lawyer and litigator)
> So this guy disagrees with Moglen, therefore Moglen is wrong and a fraud,
> based on what? His credentials? Moglen is also a practicing IP lawyer as
> well as a law professor.
Moglen is a liar. And Stallman too.