Re: GPL v3 Draft
On 1/18/06, Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:34:24AM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > On 1/18/06, Alexander Terekhov <alexander.terekhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 1/18/06, Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:48:11AM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > > > > Care to post a link to rules of New York?
> > > >
> > > > It's not up to me. You charged Moglen with offenses, you back it up.
> > >
> > > In this type of offence it sorta goes the other way around: let Moglen back
> > > up some of his fraudulent legal claims like "the GPL is not a contract" ("no
> > > need" to upper case disclaimers aside for a moment).
> >
> > Here's an example.
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.int-property/msg/af75f708f55b4f5a
> >
> > (PTRAVEL is a practicing IP lawyer and litigator)
>
> So this guy disagrees with Moglen, therefore Moglen is wrong and a fraud,
> based on what? His credentials? Moglen is also a practicing IP lawyer as
> well as a law professor.
Moglen is a liar. And Stallman too.
http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-March/004301.html
http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004306.html
http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004308.html
http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004309.html
http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004321.html
http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004353.html
http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004358.html
http://xfree86.org/pipermail/forum/2004-April/004384.html
regards,
alexander.
Reply to: