[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Trolltech GPL violation?



On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 09:34:52PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 11:25:35AM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
> >> <halbtaxabo-debml@yahoo.com> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Trolltech releases the "Open Source Edition" of Qt
> >> > under the GPL. The complete package downloadable from
> >> > their website includes the libraries, tools like
> >> > qtdesigner, and documentation in .html format. Source
> >> > code for the libraries and tools is provided.
> >> >
> >> > However, no source code is provided for the .html
> >> > documentation files.
> >> 
> >> The "source code" for the documentation is embedded as comments in the
> >> program source code, in a doxygen-like way.
> >> 
> >> Trolltech has not, to my knowledge, released the tool they use to
> >> generate the HTML from the comments.
> >
> > Then we do indeed have (yet again) a non-redistributable Qt bundle -
> > the GPL explicitly includes such tools as 'source', with the singular
> > exception that it doesn't include things normally shipped with the
> > operating system (like generic compilers).
> 
> It's also licensed under the QPL, which does not have this requirement.

Unfortunately the QPL is not a free license (although the
GPL-compatibility issue does not apply here).

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: