Re: GPL compatible license?
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > or instead you may notify anyone requesting source that it is
> > > freely available from the Elm Development Group.
> Doesn't it say that it is sufficient to inform the users that they
> can fetch the entire source code of Elm from the Elm Development Group?
> Additionally, aren't the users informed about this properly by distributing
> this license, e.g. in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright?
What happens if 10 years from now the Elm Development Group no longer exists?
This clause can't be enough, since anyone might become unable to satisfy it.