Re: non-free firmware: driver in main or contrib?
>> >I'm telling you some drivers *do depend* on a certain firmware. You're
>> >still repeating the opposite. Now explain me how in ipw2200 case the
>> >driver doesn't *depend* on the firmware, since you seem to know the
>> You are using a different meaning of "depend" than the one used by
>> policy. I can't see why it should matter if a device driver is designed
>> to use features present in a specific firmware revision.
>Let's "port" this sentence into an other context.
>"I can't see why it should matter if a program is designed to use
>features present in a specific library revision"
So? What is your point?