Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org> wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:23:31PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> What's silly or unrealistic about it? The totalitarian state in
>> question is the People's Republic of China. The original name of this
>> test is the "Chinese Dissident" test.
>
>I find it gross that it was suddenly renamed, losing much of its meaning
>for false "political correctness". It'd be nice if the FAQ would correct
>this.
Why is the state in question significant? There's no shortage of places
where writing subversive software may result in bad things happening.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to: