Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:23:31PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:15:31PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> > The "dissident test" does sound very silly the way it is described in
> > the FAQ. Perhaps the FAQ should give a realistic example as well as
> > the memorable but silly "dissident" example.
>
> What's silly or unrealistic about it? The totalitarian state in
> question is the People's Republic of China. The original name of this
> test is the "Chinese Dissident" test.
I find it gross that it was suddenly renamed, losing much of its meaning
for false "political correctness". It'd be nice if the FAQ would correct
this.
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to: