MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-07-10 23:13:50 +0100 Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it> wrote: > >> IMHO, Debian logos should be DFSG-free. Their appropriate use should be >> enforced via trademark laws, not copyright ones, if this is possible. > > Great. Please review > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200309/msg00837.html > and the original discussion of the logo licensing at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/1999/debian-legal-199902/msg00088.html > and tell us how to proceed. > > I suspect a first step is to split the licences into copyright and > trademark sections if possible. I assume this needs to be a US law > copyright licence and proposed to SPI's board as copyright holder? Or > must debian instruct them somehow? If both, which route first? Also note that a logo which is non-free due to a trademark license is no better than a logo which is non-free due to a copyright license. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature