Nathanael Nerode wrote: > J.B. Nicholson-Owens wrote: >>Matthew Palmer wrote: >>>The litmus test here is "a significant amount of functionality", not >>>"will refuse to work at all without it", although that's a fairly good >>>description of a console without a ROM. >> >>Would one ROM cut it, then? > > Yes, in a word! Or, indeed, a compiler designed to create such ROMs. Given that many ROMs are written/modified in machine code with a hex editor, I would go as far as to say that if we have a reasonable belief that even one person will ever use the emulator for the purposes of running a hand-written ROM, then the emulator should go to main. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature