MJ Ray wrote: > On 2004-07-12 07:49:55 +0100 Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote: > >> At least, not as the DFSG is currently written. You could propose that >> GPL-compatibility be a DFSG criterion. It might pass. > > I think restrospectively justifying a "Holier than Stallman" tag with > such a decision is unlikely to happen. The MIT/X11-style licences are > fine for some tasks. While I understand what you mean by this (and I would also disagree with such a clause) the MIT/X11-style licenses _are_ GPL-compatible. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature