Re: "remove this package from another developer" (was: Bug#251983: Please remove libcwd from main; it is licensed under the QPL, which is non-free.)

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: "remove this package from another developer" (was: Bug#251983: Please remove libcwd from main; it is licensed under the QPL, which is non-free.)
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:35:25 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040712033525.GU15351@redwald.deadbeast.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20040710130337.GK18366@riva.ucam.org>
References: <200407092123.06711.sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> <[🔎] 20040710080910.GB27082@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 20040710125404.GA8771@khazad-dum.debian.net> <[🔎] 20040710130337.GK18366@riva.ucam.org>

On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 02:03:37PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> debian-legal is an undelegated advisory body. Ultimately, the final
> decision lies with the archive maintainers.

I see.  Where are the archive maintainers' official delegations?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |      The greatest productive force is
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      human selfishness.
branden@debian.org                 |      -- Robert Heinlein
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "remove this package from another developer" (was: Bug#251983: Please remove libcwd from main; it is licensed under the QPL, which is non-free.)
  - From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

References:
- "remove this package from another developer" (was: Bug#251983: Please remove libcwd from main; it is licensed under the QPL, which is non-free.)
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: "remove this package from another developer" (was: Bug#251983: Please remove libcwd from main; it is licensed under the QPL, which is non-free.)
  - From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: "remove this package from another developer" (was: Bug#251983: Please remove libcwd from main; it is licensed under the QPL, which is non-free.)
  - From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
Next by Date: Re: "remove this package from another developer"
Previous by thread: Re: "remove this package from another developer" (was: Bug#251983: Please remove libcwd from main; it is licensed under the QPL, which is non-free.)
Next by thread: Re: "remove this package from another developer" (was: Bug#251983: Please remove libcwd from main; it is licensed under the QPL, which is non-free.)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread