[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Visualboy Advance question.



On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 03:30:18PM -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> Hmm. I wonder if other emulators have the same problems as the atari800
> emulator. From the description:
> 
>  "The Atari Operating System ROMs are not available with this package,  
>  due to copyright. You'll have to either make copies of them from an
>  old Atari computer, or see README.Debian for other ways to obtain
>  them."
> 
> I'd say that this was a valid reason to put atari800 into contrib. My
> understanding is that this emulator *just won't work* without these
> ROMs. No matter what "data" ROM you want to run, you need the OS ROMs to
> do so.

This describes the situation with xtrs (almost) perfectly[1].

> I know it may be a fine point, but I'd contrast that with an emulator
> that is free and self-sufficient, but for which there is no DFSG-free
> software to run.

A *lot* of old home computer emulators won't be self-sufficient without the
ROM, because the environments were so constrained that ROM-based service
routines were very heavily used.

[1] The exception being Model 4 operating systems, which were written to be
    far more independent of the BASIC ROM.  In the case of the 4P, the
    BASIC ROM was not even loaded into RAM.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    If you make people think they're
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    thinking, they'll love you; but if
branden@debian.org                 |    you really make them think, they'll
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    hate you.            -- Don Marquis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: