debian-legal Jun 2004 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page]
Page 1 of 2 >
[next page]
[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
<AUTO> {MSEMEA#717-276}something for you [Fwd: Licence for Icons] ALERT - Virus W32/Netsky.p@MM (ED) found; an attachment has been quarantined Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Banner Advertisements Re: Bug#251026: It's coming.. Re: Bug#251885: ITP: cgal -- C++ library for computational geometry Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Bug#254596: jftpgw: Several license problems cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Re: cc65 licensing Re: cc65 licensing (was: cc65 license check -- main or non-free?) chugging Contracts and licenses Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness] Creative Commons Attribution license element DBD::InterBase licence Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Re: DFSG#10 and the Open Source Initiative dpANSI Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free FAQ Improvements (was: license change for POSIX manpages) Free Linux Kernel gens License Check - Non-free historical question about fceu in contrib Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Re: ipw2100 firmware distributable? Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Licence problems with psybnc Licening ibwebadmin and JSRS license change for POSIX manpages Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Nick Carter email auto-response - please read... oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source patent aspects, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# request-tracker3: license shadiness The last update was on 06:19 GMT Mon May 06. There are 645 messages. Page 1 of 2.

<<
[previous month]
|<
[first page]
<
[previous page]
Page 1 of 2
>
[next page]
>|
[last page]
>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc