debian-legal Jun 2004 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 2

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

.jareeN.

Free Linux Kernel Jun 27

Frank Küster

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17

Måns Rullgård

Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: XMMS in main? Jun 05
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 08
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05

Adam McKenna

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 06
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 02
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Jun 08
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Jun 07
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 05
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 07

Adam Warner

Re: dpANSI Jun 23
Re: dpANSI Jun 22

Alexander Cherepanov

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18

Andre Lehovich

license change for POSIX manpages Jun 08

Andreas Barth

Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18

Andrew Pollock

Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Jun 10
How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Jun 10

Andrew Saunders

Re: dpANSI Jun 22
Re: Tracking down Rockfall's copyright holder. Jun 20

Andrew Suffield

Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 03
Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 23
Re: XMMS in main? Jun 05
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Jul 01
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 29
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 26
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 23
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Jun 01
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Summaries in general, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 24
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 04
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 29
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 10
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 08
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 10
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 12
Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 24
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 11
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 10
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Jun 01
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 25
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 10

Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 29
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 24
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 03
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 15
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 17
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 14
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 14

Arnoud Engelfriet

Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: RFC: moving from BSD to GPL Jun 24
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29

Barak Pearlmutter

FAQ Improvements (was: license change for POSIX manpages) Jun 10
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 15
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 08
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 14
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 08

batist

Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30

Benjamin Cutler

gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: cc65 licensing (was: cc65 license check -- main or non-free?) Jun 25
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 21
cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 20
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 20
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 21
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 20
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 20
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 25
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 21
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19

Bernhard R. Link

Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 08
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13

Billy Biggs

Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 21

Branden Robinson

Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 10
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 03
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 30
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 08
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 08
xinetd license possibly violates DFSG #4 Jun 30
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 08
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 08
PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Jun 30
Re: DFSG#10 and the Open Source Initiative Jun 03
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 03
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 08

Brian Nelson

Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 24

Brian Thomas Sniffen

Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test Jul 01
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 14
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 15
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 24
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 15
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 28
Contracts and licenses Jun 28
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 03
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29

Camm Maguire

Re: dpANSI Jun 21
Re: dpANSI Jun 22
dpANSI Jun 21

Carlo Wood

Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 04

Damyan Ivanov

Re: DBD::InterBase licence Jun 15
DBD::InterBase licence Jun 15

Dan Korostelev

Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19

Dave Howe

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18

David Schwartz

RE: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 19

Don Armstrong

Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 06
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23

DSAVOIDCI-PROXY001(Network Associates Anti-Virus - Mailbox Agent)

ALERT - Virus W32/Netsky.p@MM (ED) found; an attachment has been quarantined Jun 06

Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 02
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 11
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 10
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 11
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 28
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 10

Evan Prodromou

Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 22
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 20
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 09
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 09
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 20
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 12
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 09
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 12
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
historical question about fceu in contrib Jun 21
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 19
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 20
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 16
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08

Florian Weimer

Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 10
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 09
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11

Francesco P. Lovergine

RFC: moving from BSD to GPL Jun 24

Francesco Paolo Lovergine

Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Jun 12

Francesco Poli

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 20
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 20
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 03
Re: Summaries in general, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 26
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 16
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 20
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 28
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 13
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 22
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 26
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 06
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 01
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 19
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 13
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 24
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 02
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 22
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 30
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 20
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 20
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 21
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 01
Re: Summaries in general, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 29
You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 01
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 17
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 03
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 02
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 21
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: Summaries in general, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 24
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 07
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 06

Frank Lichtenheld

Re: Unterminated sentence at webwml/english/legal/licenses/dls-007-opl.wml Jun 28

Gerfried Fuchs

scummvm dependent games: non-free? Jun 25

Glenn Maynard

Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 03
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 08
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Jun 01
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 03
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 06
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 06
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 10
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 05
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 10
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 07
Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Jun 10
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness] Jun 11
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Jun 03
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 10
Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 02
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 03

Gustavo R. Montesino

Unterminated sentence at webwml/english/legal/licenses/dls-007-opl.wml Jun 21

Henning Makholm

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 02
Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Jun 04
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04

Humberto Massa

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 29
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18

info

Banner Advertisements Jun 10

J.B. Nicholson-Owens

Tracking down Rockfall's copyright holder. Jun 20
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 21

Jacobo Tarrio

Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 10

jens persson

Re: scummvm dependent games: non-free? Jun 25

Jeroen van Wolffelaar

Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07
oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 07

Jerry Haltom

XMMS in main? Jun 05
Re: XMMS in main? Jun 09

Jim Marhaus

Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 23
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13
Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 08
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 25
Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 10

Jimmy

chugging Jun 07

Joachim Breitner

Licence problems with psybnc Jun 14
Re: scummvm dependent games: non-free? Jun 25
Unfortunate Licence Mix Jun 14

Joachim Reichel

Re: Bug#251885: ITP: cgal -- C++ library for computational geometry Jun 03

Joe Moore

Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 18

Joe Nahmias

Re: historical question about fceu in contrib Jun 29

Joe Wreschnig

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17

Josh Triplett

Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 18
Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test Jun 30
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 16
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 29
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 09
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 09
Re: Tracking down Rockfall's copyright holder. Jun 23
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 29
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Bug#251885: ITP: cgal -- C++ library for computational geometry Jun 03
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 22
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 09
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 06
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 24
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11
Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Jun 14
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27
Re: scummvm dependent games: non-free? Jun 25
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 10
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 30
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 15
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Jun 17

Joshua Kwan

Re: Bug#251026: It's coming.. Jun 30

Ken Arromdee

Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 16
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 09

Lewis Jardine

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Jun 04
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 28
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 23
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 08
Re: Apple's APSL 2.0 " Debian Free Software Guidelines"-compliant? Jun 27

Lex Spoon

Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 29
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 24
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 25
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: Contracts and licenses Jun 28
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 12
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12

Mahesh T. Pai

Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 23
Re: patent aspects, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 25
Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Jun 15
Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jun 09
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 11
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12

Marco Franzen

Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 14
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 14
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 13
Re: ipw2100 firmware distributable? Jun 01
Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jun 15
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 13

martin f krafft

Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Jun 02

Matthew Palmer

Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 07
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 01
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 21
Re: Visualboy Advance question. Jun 22
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 11
Re: license change for POSIX manpages Jun 09
Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness] Jun 11
Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jun 12
Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Jul 01
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 06
Re: cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Jun 21

Matthew Wilcox

Matthieu Delahaye

Which license for a documentation? Jun 04

mdpoole

Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 11

Michael Poole

Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Jun 07
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: cc65 licensing Jun 25
Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 10
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Jun 08
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 17
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18
request-tracker3: license shadiness Jun 10
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Jun 18
Re: RFC: moving from BSD to GPL Jun 24
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 16
Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jun 18
Re: gens License Check - Non-free Jun 18

Microsoft MKB Info Nederland

<AUTO> {MSEMEA#717-276}something for you Jun 16

MJ Ray

Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 07
Re: Summary Update: MPL inconclusive, clarifications needed Jun 23
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 04
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
US venue clause, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 24
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 03
Re: Which license for a documentation? Jun 05
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 04
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Jun 06
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 09
Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Jun 08
Re: Summaries in general, was: Summary Update: MPL ... Jun 28

The last update was on 06:19 GMT Mon May 06. There are 645 messages. Page 1 of 2.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 2

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc