On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:31:27PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Andrew Suffield wrote: > <snip> > >> No. GCC has different parts under different licenses (although all are > >> GPL-compatible). Parts are GPL, parts are LGPL, parts are GPL with > >> special libgcc exception, etc. > > > > I don't believe there are any LGPL parts. > > libf2c/libU77 > portions of libiberty > portions of libjava > some test cases Hmm, what a mess. I wonder how that interacts with the other parts; I suspect some of it degrades to the GPL, which could actually be problematic. The debian/copyright file is wrong (again) too. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature