Re: Social Contract: Practical Implications
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 06:12:33PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> The fact that non-free license texts are allowed in main does not imply
> that every other bit of non-free software must be allowed in, too.
When I brought up the fact that the GPL was non-modifiable everyone
rolled their eyes and said "this question is dead and buried, read the
archives." Why is it being brought up again? Why aren't people just
bein referred to the archives, why is there any discussion at all?