Re: Jimi (Java lib) as a Debian package, is it legal?

To: Arnaud Vandyck <avdyk@debian.org>
Cc: asd@suespammers.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Jimi (Java lib) as a Debian package, is it legal?
From: Dalibor Topic <robilad@kaffe.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:28:12 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 3FB7978C.9030305@kaffe.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031116.120041.00455062.avdyk@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 3FB4BAE5.2040609@emcken.dk> <[🔎] FE8EE8CD-16D3-11D8-A4C8-00039317863E@suespammers.org> <[🔎] 20031116.120041.00455062.avdyk@debian.org>

Arnaud Vandyck wrote:

Well, for the gif problem... I suppose we'll never be able to support
that?

I guess whenever that software patent expires worldwide debian canhappily support gifs.


cheers,
dalibor topic

Reply to:

References:
- Jimi (Java lib) as a Debian package, is it legal?
  - From: Jacob Emcken <jacob@emcken.dk>
- Re: Jimi (Java lib) as a Debian package, is it legal?
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: Jimi (Java lib) as a Debian package, is it legal?
  - From: Arnaud Vandyck <avdyk@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Jimi (Java lib) as a Debian package, is it legal?
Next by Date: Re: Proposed Apache license & patent/reciprocity issues
Previous by thread: Re: Jimi (Java lib) as a Debian package, is it legal?
Next by thread: Any legal issues when copying an API?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread