[previous month] |
[first page] |
[previous page] |
Page 1 of 3 |
[next page] |
[last page] |
[next month] |

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

**Re: GNU FDL and Debian***Thomas Bushnell, BSG***Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287)***Thomas Bushnell, BSG***Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287)***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287)***Thomas Bushnell, BSG***Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287)***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287)***Thomas Bushnell, BSG***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Brian Nelson***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***David B Harris*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Henning Makholm***Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Steve Langasek***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nick Phillips***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Steve Langasek***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nick Phillips***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Dylan Thurston***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Manoj Srivastava***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John H. Robinson, IV***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Manoj Srivastava***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Jakob Bohm***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Dylan Thurston***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Joe Wreschnig***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Branden Robinson***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Lynn Winebarger***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Henning Makholm***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Branden Robinson***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Andrew Suffield***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Henning Makholm***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Andrew Suffield***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nick Phillips***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Andrew Suffield***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Lynn Winebarger***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Andrew Suffield**Message not available***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Fedor Zuev***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***MJ Ray***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Fedor Zuev***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Keith Dunwoody***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Fedor Zuev***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Keith Dunwoody***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Fedor Zuev***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***MJ Ray***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Joe Moore***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Andrew Suffield***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Manoj Srivastava***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Fedor Zuev***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Manoj Srivastava***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Fedor Zuev***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Manoj Srivastava***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Stephane Bortzmeyer***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Manoj Srivastava***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Richard Braakman***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Manoj Srivastava***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Matthew Garrett***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John H. Robinson, IV***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Richard Braakman***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Thomas Bushnell, BSG***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nick Phillips***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John H. Robinson, IV***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Branden Robinson***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***MJ Ray***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Thomas Bushnell, BSG***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: OT: TV signals [Was: Inconsistencies in our approach]***Joe Wreschnig***Re: OT: TV signals [Was: Inconsistencies in our approach]***Keith Dunwoody***Re: OT: TV signals [Was: Inconsistencies in our approach]***Joe Wreschnig***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nick Phillips***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Thomas Bushnell, BSG***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Joey Hess***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Joe Wreschnig***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Joe Moore***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***MJ Ray***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Lynn Winebarger***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***MJ Ray***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Lynn Winebarger***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Thomas Bushnell, BSG***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***MJ Ray***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Matthew Garrett***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***John Goerzen***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Matthew Garrett**Message not available***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Matthew Garrett***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Thomas Bushnell, BSG***OT: Documentation as a Program [Re: Inconsistencies in our approach]***Don Armstrong***Re: OT: Documentation as a Program [Re: Inconsistencies in our approach]***Thomas Bushnell, BSG***Re: OT: Documentation as a Program [Re: Inconsistencies in our approach]***Don Armstrong***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Joe Moore***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Wouter Verhelst***Re: Inconsistencies in our approach***Matthew Garrett***please check mplayer 0.90-3***A Mennucc1***License evaluation sought***Tore Anderson***Re: License evaluation sought***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: License evaluation sought***Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker***Re: License evaluation sought***Tore Anderson***Re: License evaluation sought***Joe Wreschnig***Re: License evaluation sought***Tore Anderson***Re: License evaluation sought***Joe Wreschnig***Re: License evaluation sought***Tore Anderson***Re: License evaluation sought***Richard Braakman***Re: License evaluation sought***Tore Anderson***Re: License evaluation sought***Joe Wreschnig***Re: License evaluation sought***Tore Anderson***Re: License evaluation sought***Branden Robinson***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***MJ Ray***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Matthew Garrett***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Matthew Garrett***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Adam Warner***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Stephane Bortzmeyer***Re: Should our documentation be free?***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Should our documentation be free?***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***MJ Ray***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***MJ Ray***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Don Armstrong***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Don Armstrong***Re: Should our documentation be free?***Manoj Srivastava***Re: Should our documentation be free?***Don Armstrong***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Andreas Metzler***Re: Should our documentation be free?***Manoj Srivastava***Re: Should our documentation be free?***Andreas Metzler***Re: Should our documentation be free?***MJ Ray*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Claus Färber***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Joe Wreschnig***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Joe Moore***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Joe Moore***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Joe Wreschnig***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Joe Moore***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Joe Wreschnig***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Joe Moore***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Joe Moore***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Joe Wreschnig***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Joe Moore***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Scott James Remnant***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in***Andrew Suffield***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach)***Branden Robinson***Re: Should our documentation be free?***Nathanael Nerode***Re: Should our documentation be free?***MJ Ray***perl modules' default licence***Nicholas Clark***Re: perl modules' default licence***Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker***Re: perl modules' default licence***Jakob Bohm***Re: perl modules' default licence***Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS***Re: perl modules' default licence***Jakob Bohm***Re: perl modules' default licence***Nicholas Clark***Re: perl modules' default licence***Jakob Bohm***msession copyright***Joerg Wendland***Re: msession copyright***Jakob Bohm***Re: msession copyright***Joerg Wendland***Re: msession copyright***Matthew Palmer***a minimal copyleft***Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS***Re: a minimal copyleft***Keith Stephen Dunwoody***Re: a minimal copyleft***Jacobo Tarrio***Re: a minimal copyleft***Branden Robinson***Re: a minimal copyleft***Andrew Suffield***Re: a minimal copyleft***Richard Braakman***Re: a minimal copyleft***Glenn Maynard***Re: a minimal copyleft***Andrew Suffield***Re: a minimal copyleft***Joe Wreschnig***Re: a minimal copyleft***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: a minimal copyleft***Glenn Maynard***Re: a minimal copyleft***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: a minimal copyleft***Joe Wreschnig***Re: a minimal copyleft***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: a minimal copyleft***Joe Wreschnig***Re: a minimal copyleft***Andrew Suffield***Re: a minimal copyleft***Steve Langasek***Re: a minimal copyleft***Andrew Suffield***Re: a minimal copyleft***Steve Langasek***Re: a minimal copyleft***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: a minimal copyleft***Andrew Suffield***EBCDIC (WAS: Re: a minimal copyleft)***Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS***Re: a minimal copyleft***Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS***Re: a minimal copyleft***Joe Wreschnig***Re: a minimal copyleft***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: a minimal copyleft***Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS***Re: a minimal copyleft***Andrew Suffield***Re: a minimal copyleft***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: a minimal copyleft***Stephane Bortzmeyer***Re: a minimal copyleft***Stephane Bortzmeyer***Take a Fantasy Cruise with Me!***Katrina***Lossless JPEG software, a patch without a license***Steve King***Re: Lossless JPEG software, a patch without a license***Matthew Palmer***Re: mplayer licenses***gabucino***Re: mplayer licenses***Josselin Mouette***Re: mplayer licenses***gabucino***Re: mplayer licenses***Josselin Mouette***Re: mplayer licenses***gabucino***Re: mplayer licenses***Adam Warner***semi-OT: does SPI have cause of action against SCO?***Steve Langasek***Re: semi-OT: does SPI have cause of action against SCO?***Nathanael Nerode*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: semi-OT: does SPI have cause of action against SCO?***andrew***APSL 2.0***Jens Schmalzing***Re: APSL 2.0***Adam Warner***Re: APSL 2.0***Lynn Winebarger***Re: APSL 2.0***Adam Warner***Re: APSL 2.0***Matthew Palmer***Re: APSL 2.0***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: APSL 2.0***Adam Warner***Re: APSL 2.0***Branden Robinson***Re: {debian-legal} Re: APSL 2.0***M. Drew Streib***Re: {debian-legal} Re: APSL 2.0***Mark Rafn***Re: {debian-legal} Re: APSL 2.0***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: APSL 2.0***MJ Ray***Re: APSL 2.0***Adam Warner***Re: APSL 2.0***Matthew Palmer***Re: APSL 2.0***MJ Ray***Re: APSL 2.0***Adam Warner***Re: APSL 2.0***MJ Ray***Re: APSL 2.0***Stephen Ryan***Re: APSL 2.0***MJ Ray***Re: APSL 2.0***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: APSL 2.0***Stephen Ryan***Re: APSL 2.0: does "complete source code" exclude data?***Mark Rafn***Re: APSL 2.0***Jeremy Hankins***Re: APSL 2.0***Bernhard R. Link***Re: APSL 2.0***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: APSL 2.0***Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet***Re: APSL 2.0***Mark Rafn***Re: APSL 2.0***Jeremy Hankins***Re: APSL 2.0***Mark Rafn***Re: APSL 2.0***Jeremy Hankins***Re: APSL 2.0***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: APSL 2.0***Jeremy Hankins***Re: APSL 2.0***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: APSL 2.0***Jeremy Hankins***Re: APSL 2.0***Branden Robinson***Re: APSL 2.0***Andrew Suffield***Re: APSL 2.0***Mark Rafn***Re: APSL 2.0***Jeremy Hankins***Re: APSL 2.0***Mark Rafn***Re: APSL 2.0***Jeremy Hankins***Re: APSL 2.0***Mark Rafn***Re: APSL 2.0***Jeremy Hankins***Re: APSL 2.0***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: APSL 2.0***Jeremy Hankins***Re: APSL 2.0***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: APSL 2.0***Nathanael Nerode***Re: APSL 2.0***Jeremy Hankins***Re: APSL 2.0***Brian Kimball***Re: APSL 2.0***MJ Ray***Re: APSL 2.0***Brian Kimball***Re: APSL 2.0***MJ Ray***Re: APSL 2.0***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: APSL 2.0***Henning Makholm***mozilla export restrictions***Wolfgang Fischer***Re: mozilla export restrictions***Florian Weimer***Re: mozilla export restrictions***Barak Pearlmutter*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: mozilla export restrictions***Wolfgang Fischer***Re: mozilla export restrictions***Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker***A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Claus Färber***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Josselin Mouette***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Lynn Winebarger***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Fedor Zuev***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Fedor Zuev***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Fedor Zuev***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Fedor Zuev***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Nick Phillips***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Richard Braakman***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Richard Braakman***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***PROCLAMATION REGARDING SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Peter S Galbraith***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Steve Langasek***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Joe Wreschnig***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Fedor Zuev***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Fedor Zuev***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Fedor Zuev***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Jimmy Kaplowitz***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Jacobo Tarrio***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***debian-legal needs a FAQ (was: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem)***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: debian-legal needs a FAQ (was: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem)***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Bernhard R. Link***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Fedor Zuev***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Bernhard R. Link***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Fedor Zuev***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Nathanael Nerode***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Matthew Garrett***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Henning Makholm***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Nathanael Nerode***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Josselin Mouette***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Josselin Mouette***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Joe Wreschnig***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Peter S Galbraith***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Jeremy Hankins***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Peter S Galbraith***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Peter S Galbraith***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Jeremy Hankins***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Stephen Ryan***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Peter S Galbraith***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Peter S Galbraith***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Peter S Galbraith***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Steve Langasek***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***MJ Ray***Then let's hear your proposal***Jeremy Hankins***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Peter S Galbraith***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Manoj Srivastava***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Jimmy Kaplowitz***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Jeremy Hankins***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Andrew Suffield***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Jimmy Kaplowitz***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Brian T. Sniffen***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Wouter Verhelst***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Sergey V. Spiridonov***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Anthony DeRobertis***Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***Branden Robinson*

[previous month] |
[first page] |
[previous page] |
Page 1 of 3 |
[next page] |
[last page] |
[next month] |

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc