Re: Bug#154281: libdvdcss ITP
- To: Colin Watson <email@example.com>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Bug#154281: libdvdcss ITP
- From: Robert Millan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:27:34 +0000
- Message-id: <20030730142734.GB661@aragorn>
- In-reply-to: <20030730122153.GB3075@riva.ucam.org>
- References: <20030729212044.GA24119@aragorn> <20030729222647.GF10221@zoy.org> <20030730005542.GA24365@aragorn> <20030730093108.GG10221@zoy.org> <20030730140146.GB500@aragorn> <20030730122153.GB3075@riva.ucam.org>
[ this thread comes from libdvdcss ITP #154281 ]
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 01:21:53PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 02:01:46PM +0000, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:31:08AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > As for the legal advice, what do you mean? Do you suggest that we
> > > > hire a lawyer to advocate in favour of libdvdcss?
> > >
> > > I suggest we hire a lawyer to tell us whether we may include
> > > libdvdcss in Debian _or not_. This is roughly what we did for the
> > > crypto-in-main issue.
> > ok. where should this be brought forward? debian-devel?
> Surely not! Legal issues are for debian-legal.
Ok. What are the necessary steps to request that we hire a lawyer to
resolve this? Can I do it on my own or is SPI the entity who should take
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."
-- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)