On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:28:31 +1000 (EST) Matthew Palmer <mjp16@ieee.uow.edu.au> wrote: > > > Well, what do they want to allow, and what don't they want to allow? > > > > I think it's pretty clear they're looking for a Sleepycat arrangement; > > free for Free Software, go to them if you want alternate arrangements. > > Whoa! Is that the actual effect of the Sleepycat DB licence? If so, > doesn't that violate DFSG#6? > > Sorry if I've just put my foot in my mouth, but it *seems* obvious enough... The GPL is also Free for Free software, and you need to contact the copyright holders for alternate arrangements.
Attachment:
pgpYjwe3qj34y.pgp
Description: PGP signature