Re: Revised LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)
Jeff Licquia writes:
> Let me try to improve on Branden's version, phrased a little differently
> so it becomes a new 5.a.2:
> "The entire Derived Work, including the Base Format, does not identify
> itself as the original, unmodified Work to the user in any way when
> This would be accompanied by a section under "WHETHER AND HOW TO
> DISTRIBUTE WORKS UNDER THIS LICENSE" talking about ways to ensure that
> derived works can adhere to 5.a.2.
> I'd really like to hear Frank or David's thoughts on this new wording,
> since we're moving into some different territory here. What do you
as I said in the other mail, I think that would be something I think would do
what is necessary and we could give suggestions elsewhere how to fullfil
5.a.2. Guess i need to think a little bit more about it to be sure, but it
seems likely. Would be fine if it does.