Could someone please answer my legal query, or provide me with some persuasive arguments for including an OpenSSL exclusion clause in addition to the GPL that I can send to Balsa upstream. I can't really work on fixing this neglected package until someone tells me what I can and can't do with Balsa's licensing and that of its dependencies. Thanks in advanced. Yours sincerely, Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau Computer Science & Student Rep, UNSW * * # apt-get into it Debian GNU/Linux Package Maintainer * * <netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0> <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0> * * GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1 9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgprq8jBFYEc3.pgp
Description: PGP signature