Re: Bug#147430: hpoj: Linking against OpenSSL licensing modification (GPL)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 12:07, PASCHAL,DAVID (HP-Roseville,ex1) wrote:
> Since for various reasons I'm trying hard to release hpoj-0.90 by the end
> of July, what are the long-term implications if for whatever reason this
> issue isn't resolved by then and I have to release 0.90 without the special
> exception for OpenSSL?
We are quite flexable in how we handle the licensing issues for HPOJ. The
important thing is to get your/HP's intent documented.
> Will it be sufficient for me to subsequently update
> the license statements in CVS and generate a corresponding patch which you
> can apply to your 0.90 package in unstable (preferable), or would I have to
> release a whole new tarball with a different version number (not
> preferable)?
I doubt a new tarball would be required. In fact an email from you to either
hpoj-devel and/or 147430@bugs.debian.org is probably sufficient as if you
make your intent clear in public forum, then your intent is clear and Debian
will act accordingly.
> Thanks for your continued patience.
No problem David. There isn't a critical timeline on this, especially since
HP are progressing this. The bugs.debian.org archive shows clearly that there
is progress so we are quite happy.
Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9Fx3CoCzanz0IthIRAlESAJ9eqzMNaZLFy6IWwFEajzHH4i43CgCfdPRK
ZVnWBKDlMGzP1CbwWWLYAJE=
=YERY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: