On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:32:59PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > However, an Invariant section, even if severable, still has DFSG > problems. > > Copyright notices, license text, and something akin to the FDL 1.2 > draft's "endorsements" are about as far as I'm willing to go. To spell this out a little more clearly: I'm not comfortable with calling this license the "Debian Free Content License" -- or the "Debian" anything, for that matter -- if the license can be exercised in such a way that the work isn't DFSG-free. To do so would feel hypocritical to me. If we're going to put our name on it, we need to not be turning around and saying "well, yeah, it's our license, but we STILL won't let you into main with it". That's just going to aggravate people even more than they already are. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Extra territorium jus dicenti branden@debian.org | impune non paretur. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgp3KAubqy1u8.pgp
Description: PGP signature