Re: license requirements for a book to be in free section
- To: sunnanvind@fenderson.com
- Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: license requirements for a book to be in free section
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Date: 04 Feb 2002 17:53:51 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87k7tsk828.fsf@becket.becket.net>
- In-reply-to: <E16UeC7-0001i8-00@sugarcube>
- References: <WFJP1C.A.dJB.asuT8@murphy> <20020123181247.BB96829830@mixing.qc.dfo.ca> <20020124104746.GE32683@cs.unibo.it> <yahk7u7c0vd.fsf@tyr.diku.dk> <20020124135732.GA2992@cs.unibo.it> <20020125064845.DC1124674B@forestfield.org> <20020125115937.GA24959@cs.unibo.it> <E16UCzA-0000LP-00@sugarcube> <20020125152116.GF1007@212.23.136.22> <E16UeC7-0001i8-00@sugarcube>
Sunnanvind Fenderson <sunnanvind@fenderson.com> writes:
> The old BSD (obnoxiuous ad clause) is and was listed as free (but
> GPL-incompatible), while it's been considered DFSG-nonfree.
You are incorrect; it was (and is) regarded as DFSG free.
Reply to: