Re: Vim should be moved to non-free (See #132251)
Previously Lazarus Long wrote:
> Reading /usr/share/doc/vim/copyright, it appears this package fails to
> comply with point 3 of the DFSG. If so, this seems "messy" at best,
> since it has been in main in previous releases, hence should probably be
> discussed on this list.
If you are interested in this discussion get on the vim-dev list
and comment on the latest proposed license from Bram.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: