Re: One unclear point in the Vim license

To: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Cc: rms@gnu.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 02 Jan 2002 15:29:14 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 87bsgcqqlx.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020102232209.GE8601@deadbeast.net>
References: <[🔎] 200201021034.g02AYQH00926@moolenaar.net> <[🔎] 87pu4sxxyi.fsf@becket.becket.net> <[🔎] 20020102232209.GE8601@deadbeast.net>

Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:

> Er, while I'm sure you're quite accustomed to saying things like this to
> me, I don't think you actually sent this to Bram.

Message-ID: <[🔎] 87vgelixih.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Message-ID: <[🔎] 87ofkdreos.fsf@becket.becket.net>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
  - From: Glenn Maynard <g_dlegal@zewt.org>

References:
- Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
  - From: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@moolenaar.net>
- Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
Next by Date: Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
Previous by thread: Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
Next by thread: Re: One unclear point in the Vim license
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread